ABS

ASF to Vote on TBA Deliverable Rule Changes

Published Updated 2 Min Read

Later this week an American Securitization Forum (ASF) committee is expected to vote on TBA delivery rule changes, possibly increasing the Jumbo loan limit to 20% from the 10% it is currently. 

In a recent report, Deutsche Bank Securities analysts noted that several large originators recently made a presentation to the ASF committee that deals with this issue advocating for the increase as Jumbo conforming loan originations have increased so much that originators could not fit all their production into the 10% limit on TBA-deliverable pools.

Analysts said that approving the change would increase negative convexity of the TBA market as unlike the 2006-2007 originations, 2008-2009 has been written to very tight credit standards.

“High credit-worthiness correlates to fast premium prepayment speeds,” they noted.  They said that in the past six months, 2008 vintage premium jumbo FNMA 5.5s have prepaid at nearly 50 CPR in aggregate versus peak speeds of around 30 CPR on non-jumbo FN 5.5s.

Agency Jumbo 4.5 through 5.5 pools currently trade 20-30 ticks behind TBAs due to their higher option cost, which appears fairly priced, Deutsche analysts said. 

However, raising the limit to 20% from 10% would drive down TBA values by 2 ticks for 4.5s, 2.5 ticks for 5s and 3 ticks for 5.5s, they calculated.

In addition to that negative impact to the TBA market analysts said it would produce more stratification and new specified pool categories, “leading to further deterioration in the TBA deliverable,” and also would not be helpful to the liquidity of the market.

At this time, Deutsche MBS analysts said they do not see much value in owning Jumbo agency pools at the current market price concessions to TBA. This is because of the “inferior convexity and liquidity” versus TBAs without even a carry advantage to compensate.


For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.


More From Asset Securitization Report

MBS: Prepay Speeds Faster than Expected in December

Capacity constraints at mortgage lenders that limited the amount of refinancings they could process in November, meant business was held over into December resulting in prepayment speeds being unexpectedly higher last month.

MBS Prepays Not as Bad as Feared in November

November prepayments were not as bad as investors feared, given the collision of elevated refinancing activity on lower mortgage rates in response to QE3 and the rush by servicers to close loans before guarantee fees increased on Dec. 1.

Speeds Slow Less than Expected in September

Prepayment speeds slowed less than expected in September . For example, 30-year FNMAs and GNMAs were projected to decline 11-12% with a four day lower day count a major factor; however, speeds slowed just 9% on FNMAs and 6% on GNMAs.

MBS Week was All About the Fed

The Federal Open Market Committee surprised the market in that the announced MBS buying was limited to agency fixed-rate MBS only and not Treasurys, although it will continue Operation Twist through yearend as scheduled.

Doldrums Hit MBS Market

There was very limited economic news or other key events affecting MBS activity this week and July prepayments became a major influence on trading.