Collins & Aikman announces amended receivables facility

Published December 14, 2004 12:00 AM EST 1 Min Read

Collins & Aikman Corp. announced that amended its existing receivables transfer agreement relating to its off-balance sheet accounts receivable financing facility. The amended terms included extending the term of the facility to Mar. 10, 2006, and installing General Electric Capital Corp. as the new administrative agent. Additionally, Collins & Aikman announced a new $300 million 5-year facility replacing the existing facility.

For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.

Uncategorized

More From Asset Securitization Report

CRE

The $3 trillion AI data center build-out becomes all-consuming for debt markets

Across US CMBS and ABS, JPMorgan projects annual data center securitization issuance could reach $30 billion to $40 billion in both 2026 and 2027.

February 2

Consumer ABS

Unsecured consumer loans support $200 million from Sunbit

The securitization was also oversubscribed, with participation from more than 25 institutional investors, which will receive a blended fixed rate of 5.71%, the company said.

By Donna Mitchell

Editor

Financial Planning

August 5

Politics and policy

Trump team eyes hiring freeze, regulatory rollbacks for CFPB

The incoming Trump administration's 'agency review team' has landed and is expected to name an acting director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Republicans on the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. or the Federal Trade Commission are among the most likely candidates.

By Kate Berry

Reporter

American Banker

January 15

Esoteric ABS

Regulatory glitch amendment expected to boost C-PACE financing in NYC

Local Law 79 affects roughly 15,000 commercial real estate buildings in New York City, a market ripe for securitization.

By Amilda Dymi

October 29

Strategic planning

NYCB’s new leaders face skeptical shareholders in wake of turmoil

During New York Community Bancorp's annual shareholder meeting, executives reiterated their mission to restore value in the beleaguered Long Island-based company. Questions from shareholders suggested at least some discontent following a capital influx that significantly diluted their position in the company.

By Allissa Kline

Reporter

American Banker

June 7