Iowa AG Miller Blasts Bank-Funded Servicer Settlement Study

Published Updated 2 Min Read

Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller blasted a study Tuesday that said proposed servicer settlement terms could cost the economy $10 billion a year. Miller, who is leading the settlement on behalf of the attorneys general, said the study was “grossly inaccurate,” and noted it was paid for by the financial services industry, including some of the servicers involved in talks with the AGs.

“This is a flawed study based on inaccurate assumptions, and it reaches grossly inaccurate conclusions,” Miller said in a press release. “This study was bought and paid for by the industry, and that fact is reflected throughout.”

The study found that the proposed settlement with the top five mortgage servicers could prolong the foreclosure crisis, drive up mortgage interest rates, slow new home construction and cost $7 billion to $10 billion a year. The study, which was obtained by ASR sister publication American Banker, was written by three economists: Charles Calomiris, a professor of financial institutions at Columbia Business School; Eric Higgins, a professor of finance at Kansas State University; and Joseph Mason, the chair of banking at Louisiana State University and a senior fellow at the Wharton School.

Miller said the study’s conclusions were wrong.

“The study’s assertion that our proposed settlement will lengthen foreclosures is off the mark,” he said. “Our proposal, if properly implemented by the servicers, should not increase the duration of foreclosures. By making foreclosures functional, servicers will make up time they’re losing now. The current dysfunctional system prolongs foreclosures.”

Miller is conducting the settlement talks along with the Justice Department, Housing and Urban Development and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.


For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.


More From Asset Securitization Report

Ocwen $2B Order Preview Sweeping Service Changes

Although Ocwen Financial agreed to pay more than $2 billion to settle allegations it mishandled foreclosures and mortgages for thousands of borrowers, it could have been even worse for the country's largest nonbank servicer.

Third-Party Robo-Signing

The crisis in mortgage lending and the anger that followed the robo-signing scandal has become a crisis of paper. There are lots of new laws and government guidance that all say some version of the same thing—mortgage lenders have to be wary of how their third-party service providers are following rules designed to protect consumers, […]

Investors Cry Foul Over Role in Mortgage Settlement

Mortgage investors, who have been complaining for months about the costs they will bear under the national servicing settlement, presented a list of proposed remedies at a congressional hearing Thursday. The settlement between 49 state attorneys general, the federal government, and the nation’s five largest servicers requires the servicers to dedicate at least $20 billion […]