Redefault Rates On Private Label Compare with GSEs

Published 1 Min Read

Borrowers with loans in private-label securities are redefaulting at the same high rates as those held by the government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Redefault rates on 1.2 million first-lien single-family mortgages are running above 50%, according to an internal note sent Wednesday to the company’s salesforce by Sean Dobson, the chairman and chief executive of Amherst Securities Group LP.

Despite attempts to stem the tide of foreclosures with the administration’s Home Affordable Modification Program, which Dobson called “a payment-based experiment on over 1 million loans,” redefault rates are expected to spike in the coming months.

“As we predicted, it [Hamp] did not work,” Dobson wrote. “If we want families to escape foreclosure, a real solution to the second-lien issue must be implemented. Otherwise the Hamp program has only had the effect of loss deferral and exacerbation rather than a more responsible goal of foreclosure avoidance and loss minimization.”

Some industry experts suggest that because it takes so long for many states to work through the backlog of foreclosures, borrowers are choosing to delay the foreclosure process by redefaulting after getting a loan mod.


For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.


More From Asset Securitization Report

OCC: Refis and Loan Mods Reducing Delinquency Rates

Servicers supervised by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency completed fewer loan modifications in the first quarter as the number of delinquent borrowers who need assistance appears to be shrinking. The OCC Mortgage Metrics Report released Wednesday morning shows the nine servicers had 867,500 loans that were 90 days or more past as […]

Amherst: Mortgage Settlement Negative for PLS Investors

The five largest bank servicers — Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan, Citigroup, and Ally Financial /GMAC — today announced a $25 billion settlement with 49 state attorneys general (except Oklahoma), the U.S. Department of Justice, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).  It was notable that both California and New York ultimately decided to […]