Regulatory drafts expected in 2nd half, early reviews heard

Published 3 Min Read

PHOENIX – After attending the recent January Financial Accoun-ting Standards Board meeting, David Thrope, partner at Ernst & Young, discussed changes to securitization accounting at last week’s ASF 2005 conference.

In all, it appears that three exposure drafts will be released at the same time, possibly in September. Those drafts are expected to delve into servicing, QSPE status, and derivative bifurcation. Liability extinguishment is likely to remain a separate issue, to be discussed at another time.

Thrope related it was decided that if an entity that sells part of an asset where participation is not a pro-rata interest, the entity has to be viewed as a SPV. The only exception appears to be for community banks, which take loans in pro-rata portions because some loans are too large for them to hold.

In the world of commercial-paper conduits, the ability to structure warehouse facilities could be limited by the decision to restructure bankruptcy remote vehicles into QSPEs. Issuers would not be able to re-acquire assets. “I think this will have a huge impact on practice,” said Thrope. A QSPE will be able to manage its liability but the person who manages that cannot benefit from it.

Thus, a number of quandaries arise for CP conduits: for instance, the 30-day rollover. “The person who decides [to rollover] cannot take spread and benefit from it,” added Thrope. Therefore, if you are a residual owner, this change could really affect you, he said.

Other changes included that QSPEs cannot own equity securities with the exception of foreclosures; a move to implement “day one fair value” when accounting for transactions where there is an allocation; and if a QSPE buys a derivative, it is considered an asset, Thrope added.

Highlighting an implementation issue with FAS 133, which focuses on how to bifurcate derivatives, was discussed. More information about FAS 133 is expected to be made available in the coming months.

Turning to impaired equity, Thrope stated EITF 03-1 was discussed at the meeting, but it appears FASB has decided to defer it. Guidance is being requested because EITF 03-1 creates a significant amount of volatility as it relates to equity returns.

Finally, some issues still up in the air relate to CDOs, specifically credit impaired selections, credit non-impairment and free trading buckets, but FASB is expected to defer opinions on those topics for now, as it prepares to roll out its trio of exposure drafts this fall, noted Thrope.

Copyright 2005 Thomson Media Inc. All Rights Reserved.

http://www.thomsonmedia.com http://www.asreport.com


For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.


More From Asset Securitization Report

Accounting Rules Call into Question Future of ABS

The American Securitization Forum (ASF) last weeksubmitted a letter to federal banking regulators. The letter requested a six-month moratorium on any regulatory capital rule changes related to the implementation of accounting standards FAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140, and FAS No. 167,Amendments to FASB Interpretation […]

FASB reiterates fair value with residuals

At last week’s meeting, the Financial Accounting Standards Board reiterated many previously indicated stances to be incorporated into the second exposure draft of the amendment to FAS 140. In a “surprise move” – described as such in an informal meeting recap from Marty Rosenblatt of Deloitte & Touche – the Board decided that MBS generated […]

Is the ultimate FIN 46 solution a “new” item on the balance sheet?

In 2003, there has been nary a dull week in securitization accounting, as just about every Wednesday the Financial Accounting Standards Board grinds out a new set of ideas, often in opposition to deliberations the week prior. Over the past three weeks, it appears the board is trying to offer some breathing room – postponing the […]

Board relaxing some FAS 140 amendment provisions

Accountants monitoring last Wednesday’s Financial Account -ing Standards Board meeting noted that FASB has tentatively “loosened” some of the hard-line provisions in the Exposure Draft of proposed amendments to FAS 140. The redeliberations will continue this Wednesday. In summary, it appears FASB will limit the requirements for legal isolation in a QSPE to the transferor […]

Three more FIN 46 FSPs from FASB

Last week the Financial Accounting Standards Board published three new FIN 46-related FASB Staff Positions on its Web site. All three are out for comment until Oct. 3. The most controversial of the pack address the so-called “kick-out” question, crucial, some say, to certain enterprises evaluating their relationships to CDOs. FIN 46 called for fees […]