Strange cases of vicarious liability:

Published 1 Min Read

2004 – Chilberg v. Chilberg: Leasing company required to pay $1 million to a child whose father ran over her in one of its vehicles, even though the leasing

company had nothing to do with the accident.

2004 – Tikhonova v. Ford Motor Co.: A passenger in a Ford leased vehicle

filed suit against Ford and the driver of the vehicle for personal injuries experienced in an accident. Both suits dropped because the driver was a Russian diplomat with immunity from liability, and thus, by extension, Ford was found free of liability as well.

2002 – J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.: Ordered to pay $28 million in damages in

connection with an accident involving a leased vehicle. Bank ceased leasing

operations in R.I., but returned when the state passed liability caps.

(c) 2005 Asset Securitization Report and SourceMedia, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

http://www.asreport.com http://www.sourcemedia.com


For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.


More From Asset Securitization Report

Can New York state ease benchmark switch for legacy Libor contracts?

An industry working group might seek legislation to eliminate the need for investor consent in the shift to a new benchmark interest rate. But any legislative fix is almost certain to be challenged because choosing an alternative to Libor will inevitably favor one party in a transaction over another.

By Allison Bisbey
Editor-in-Chief
Asset Securitization Report